Logo File Formats
|
Feb 5, 2026

Best Logo Formats for Websites: SVG, PNG, JPG Explained

Your logo is often the first thing visitors see when they land on your website. But choosing the wrong file format can make it load slowly, look blurry on high-resolution screens, or fail to display properly across different browsers.

Your logo is often the first thing visitors see when they land on your website. But choosing the wrong file format can make it load slowly, look blurry on high-resolution screens, or fail to display properly across different browsers.

The format you choose affects how fast your site loads, how sharp your logo appears, and how easily you can update it later. Most websites still use outdated formats simply because "that's what the designer sent." This guide cuts through the confusion and shows you exactly which logo format to use and when.

We'll focus on three main formats: SVG, PNG, and JPG. By the end, you'll know which one belongs in your website header and which ones to avoid entirely.

What Websites Need from a Logo File

Not all logo formats work the same way on the web. A file that looks perfect in Photoshop might cause problems when placed in your website header.

Here's what matters for web logos:

File size directly impacts loading speed. Google uses page speed as a ranking factor, and 53% of mobile users abandon sites that take longer than three seconds to load. Your logo shouldn't be the reason visitors leave.

Scalability determines how your logo looks on different screen sizes. The same logo needs to work on a 4K desktop monitor and a small mobile screen without becoming pixelated or blurry.

Transparency allows your logo to sit cleanly on different background colors. Websites change. You might update your header color or place your logo over an image. Formats without transparency support create awkward white boxes around your logo.

Browser compatibility ensures every visitor sees your logo correctly. If a format doesn't work in Safari or Firefox, some of your audience sees a broken image icon instead of your brand.

Editing flexibility matters when you need to make changes. Can you resize it without quality loss? Can you change colors easily? The right format makes updates simple instead of forcing you to go back to your designer every time.

Modern web logos need to check all these boxes. Legacy formats that worked in 2010 often fall short today.

SVG Logos: Best Overall Option

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) is the gold standard for website logos in 2025. Unlike traditional image formats, SVG files contain mathematical instructions that tell browsers how to draw your logo. This fundamental difference creates several advantages.

Why SVG Works So Well

Your logo stays perfectly sharp at any size. Zoom in 500% and the edges remain crisp. Display it on a Retina screen and it looks flawless. This happens because SVGs scale infinitely without losing quality.

File sizes typically stay extremely small. A simple logo might be just 1-3 KB as an SVG, compared to 20-50 KB as a PNG. More complex logos with multiple colors and shapes still rarely exceed 10-15 KB. Smaller files mean faster loading times.

SVGs support full transparency naturally. Your logo sits cleanly on any background without extra work.

You can edit SVG files with CSS and JavaScript. Need to change your logo color when users switch to dark mode? Simple CSS does it. Want your logo to animate on hover? JavaScript makes it possible. You can make these changes without touching image editing software.

Search engines can read the text and structure inside SVG files. This doesn't dramatically impact SEO, but it's better than formats that appear as black boxes to crawlers.

Browser Support Is Excellent

All modern browsers support SVG: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera all handle them perfectly. According to Can I Use, SVG has over 98% browser support globally. Even older versions of Internet Explorer (IE 9+) render SVGs correctly.

When SVG Creates Problems

A few edge cases exist where SVG becomes complicated:

Extremely complex logos with hundreds of paths, gradients, and effects can create larger file sizes than PNG. If your logo file exceeds 50 KB as an SVG, PNG might compress better.

Photos within logos don't work well in SVG format. If your logo incorporates a photograph or highly detailed raster image, you'll need PNG instead.

Some email clients don't support SVG images. If you're choosing a logo format for email signatures or newsletters, PNG becomes the safer choice.

Legacy system requirements occasionally force PNG usage. Some older content management systems or e-commerce platforms have trouble with SVG uploads, though this becomes rarer each year.

For 90% of websites, SVG should be your default choice for logos. The performance and quality benefits outweigh the rare situations where it doesn't work perfectly.

PNG Logos: When to Use Them

PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files remain relevant for specific use cases, even though SVG typically performs better.

PNG Strengths

Universal compatibility is PNG's biggest advantage. Every browser, email client, social media platform, and application supports PNG. If you're unsure whether SVG will work somewhere, PNG always will.

Transparency support makes PNG suitable for logos that need to sit on varied backgrounds. The format handles transparency well, though file sizes increase compared to SVG.

Raster detail preservation matters when your logo includes photographic elements, complex textures, or effects that don't translate well to vector format. Gradients, shadows, and intricate details sometimes look better as PNG.

Easier for non-technical users to work with. Most people know how to resize and place PNG files. SVG sometimes confuses users unfamiliar with vector graphics.

The Retina Screen Problem

Standard PNG logos look blurry on high-resolution displays. Modern smartphones, tablets, and laptops pack 2-3x more pixels into the same physical space. A logo that looks sharp on a regular monitor appears fuzzy on these devices.

The solution requires creating PNG files at 2x or 3x your display size. If your logo displays at 200px wide, you need a PNG file that's 400-600px wide. The browser then scales it down, making it appear crisp on high-resolution screens.

This approach creates a trade-off. Larger PNG files take longer to load. You're increasing file size to maintain quality, whereas SVG stays crisp at any resolution without size penalties.

When PNG Makes Sense

Use PNG for website logos when:

Your logo incorporates photographs or highly detailed raster artwork that can't convert cleanly to vector format.

You need guaranteed compatibility with older systems, email clients, or platforms that don't support SVG.

Your website platform or content management system blocks SVG uploads for security reasons.

You're creating a favicon or app icon that requires specific pixel dimensions. While SVG favicons work in modern browsers, PNG remains more universally supported for these use cases.

Your logo includes complex effects, textures, or filters that look better as a rendered image than as vector paths.

Optimizing PNG Logos

If you must use PNG, optimization becomes critical:

Export at the correct dimensions. Don't upload a 2000px logo and let CSS shrink it to 200px. That wastes bandwidth. Export at exactly the size you need (or 2x for Retina support).

Use PNG-8 instead of PNG-24 when possible. Logos with limited colors (under 256) compress much better as PNG-8 without visible quality loss.

Run PNG files through compression tools like TinyPNG or ImageOptim before uploading. These tools reduce file size by 50-70% without affecting visual quality.

Serve WebP format alongside PNG for browsers that support it. Modern browsers render WebP images much faster. You can implement this with HTML picture elements that fall back to PNG for older browsers.

PNG works when you need it, but requires more effort to maintain performance compared to SVG.

JPG Logos: Why to Avoid Them

JPG (JPEG) files are designed for photographs, not logos. Using JPG for website logos creates several problems that outweigh any perceived benefits.

Why JPG Fails for Logos

No transparency support means your logo sits in a rectangular box. That white or colored background looks unprofessional and limits where you can place your logo. Background color changes require creating new logo files.

Compression artifacts damage logo quality. JPG uses lossy compression that creates visible distortion around sharp edges and text. Your logo's crisp lines become fuzzy and develop color bleeding. The format literally breaks the clean design your logo requires.

Poor text rendering makes wordmarks and text-based logos look especially bad. JPG compression creates blur and color fringing around letters that destroys readability at small sizes.

File sizes aren't actually smaller for logos. JPG compression works well for photographs with gradual color transitions. Logos typically have solid colors and sharp edges, which JPG handles inefficiently. A logo that's 15 KB as PNG might be 20 KB as JPG with worse quality.

Editing degrades quality every time you save. Each time you open and save a JPG, it recompresses and loses more quality. Make three edits and your logo looks noticeably worse. PNG and SVG don't have this problem.

When People Mistakenly Choose JPG

Several misconceptions lead designers and developers toward JPG for logos:

"JPG files are smaller" – True for photos, false for logos. The compression algorithm that shrinks photographs efficiently damages logos.

"Everyone supports JPG" – Also true of PNG, which offers transparency JPG lacks. Browser support isn't a JPG advantage.

"It's what my designer sent" – Designers sometimes export JPG by habit or oversight. Ask for SVG or PNG instead.

"I need it for social media" – Most platforms accept PNG and render it better than JPG for logos.

The Only Acceptable JPG Use Case

JPG makes sense for logos in one specific situation: your logo incorporates detailed photographs as integral design elements, not just backgrounds. If photographic texture is part of your logo's core design, JPG might compress that photographic content more efficiently than PNG.

Even then, consider whether separating the photographic elements from vector elements might work better. You could use SVG for the clean shapes and text while using JPG only for photographic components layered separately.

For 99% of websites, JPG has no place in logo implementation. Choose SVG or PNG instead.

Logo Formats for Headers, Footers, and Favicons

Different logo placements sometimes require different formats or optimization strategies.

Header Logos

Your header logo gets seen on every page visit and affects perceived loading speed.

Use SVG for standard header logos. The combination of small file size and infinite scalability makes SVG ideal for this high-visibility position. Visitors on 4K monitors see the same crisp logo as users on smartphones.

Optimize for height, not width. Headers typically constrain logo height while allowing flexible width. Export your SVG with the height you'll actually use. A 50px tall logo doesn't need vector data for 500px height.

Consider a simplified version for mobile headers if your full logo is complex. Mobile headers have limited space. A simplified mark or wordmark loads faster and displays better on small screens. Understanding the different logo types explained helps you decide which variation works best for each context.

Implement lazy loading with caution. Header logos should load immediately since they're above the fold. Reserve lazy loading for footer logos and other below-the-fold placements.

Footer Logos

Footer logo requirements differ slightly from headers:

SVG still works best for the same reasons as headers. File size and scalability matter regardless of position.

Lazy loading makes sense here. Footers load after main content, so delaying the logo slightly improves perceived performance. Most users see your content before scrolling to the footer anyway.

Opacity and styling variations become common in footers. You might show a lighter version of your logo or change colors to match the footer design. SVG's CSS styling capabilities make these variations simple without creating multiple image files.

Favicons and App Icons

Favicons (the tiny icons in browser tabs) and app icons have specific requirements:

PNG remains the safer choice for favicons. While modern browsers support SVG favicons, implementation varies. PNG works universally across all browsers and devices.

Create multiple sizes. Favicons appear at different dimensions depending on context: 16x16px in tabs, 32x32px in bookmarks, 180x180px for Apple Touch icons, 512x512px for Android. Generate a proper favicon package with all required sizes.

Simplify your design. A logo that works at 200px wide might become an unrecognizable blob at 16x16px. Create a simplified icon version that remains recognizable at tiny sizes.

Use ICO format for broadest compatibility. The .ico format can contain multiple sizes in one file and works in older browsers. Generate it alongside your PNG files.

Consider SVG for progressive web apps. If you're building a PWA, SVG favicons offer better quality on high-resolution devices while keeping file size minimal.

Different logo positions have different technical needs, but SVG handles most situations better than alternatives.

Recommended Logo Format Stack for Websites

The best approach uses multiple formats strategically rather than picking one format for everything.

The Ideal Setup

Primary logo: SVG Use SVG as your default website logo for headers, footers, and anywhere your logo appears within your site's design. Export a clean, optimized SVG from your vector design software.

Fallback: PNG at 2x resolution Include a PNG version at double your display size for situations where SVG doesn't work. This covers edge cases and ensures compatibility with older systems.

Favicon: PNG + ICO Generate a complete favicon package with PNG files at multiple sizes and an ICO file for legacy browser support.

Social media: PNG at required dimensions Each social platform has specific size requirements. Export PNG files that match those specifications exactly. Open Graph images, Twitter cards, and LinkedIn previews all need properly sized PNGs.

Email signature: PNG at exact size Email clients don't reliably support SVG. Use PNG at the exact display size you need for email signatures and newsletter headers.

Implementing the Stack

Start by ensuring you have a clean vector source file in AI, EPS, or native design software format. This becomes the source for all other formats. Following the principles of good logo design ensures your logo translates well across all formats.

Export your SVG with these optimization steps:

Remove unnecessary metadata and hidden layers from your design software before exporting. Many programs include excessive data that bloats file size.

Optimize the SVG code. Tools like SVGOMG compress SVG files by removing redundant information while maintaining visual quality. This typically reduces file size by 30-60%.

Test across browsers. Open your SVG in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge to confirm it renders correctly everywhere.

For PNG files:

Export at 2x your largest display size for Retina support. If your logo displays at maximum 300px wide, export PNG at 600px wide.

Use PNG-24 for logos with gradients or transparency, PNG-8 for simple logos with solid colors under 256 colors total.

Compress with tools like TinyPNG before uploading. This maintains quality while dramatically reducing file size.

Keep source files organized. Store your original design files, exported SVG, all PNG variants, and favicon sets in clearly labeled folders. You'll need these files for future updates.

Code Implementation Example

Implement your logo stack in HTML with fallbacks:

html

<picture>

  <source type="image/svg+xml" srcset="logo.svg">

  <img src="logo.png" alt="Company Name" width="200" height="50">

</picture>

This code attempts to load SVG first. If the browser doesn't support SVG (extremely rare), it falls back to PNG automatically.

For better performance, specify explicit width and height attributes. This prevents layout shift as the page loads and improves Core Web Vitals scores.

Quick Checklist for Choosing the Right Logo Format

Use this decision framework when selecting logo formats:

Is your logo purely vector-based with solid colors, gradients, and clean shapes? → Use SVG for website implementation

Does your logo incorporate photographs or highly complex raster effects? → Use PNG at 2x resolution

Are you implementing in an email client or platform that blocks SVG? → Use optimized PNG

Is this for a favicon or app icon? → Use PNG at multiple required sizes plus ICO format

Do you need to place your logo on varied background colors? → Use SVG or PNG with transparency, never JPG

Is file size critical and you have a simple logo? → Use SVG, which typically produces the smallest files

Do you need to programmatically change logo colors or animations? → Use SVG with CSS and JavaScript manipulation

Are you creating assets for social media sharing? → Use PNG at the exact dimensions each platform requires

Is universal compatibility more important than optimal performance? → Use PNG as your primary format with proper optimization

Did someone send you a JPG logo? → Request SVG or PNG instead unless the logo contains integral photographic elements

Following this checklist eliminates guesswork and ensures your logo looks sharp, loads quickly, and works across all contexts.

SVG First, PNG When Needed, Never JPG

The modern website logo format hierarchy is clear: SVG for almost everything, PNG when compatibility or raster detail requires it, and JPG almost never.

SVG delivers superior quality at smaller file sizes while giving you flexibility for styling and animations. Browser support is excellent. Implementation is straightforward. The format simply works better for the vast majority of logos.

PNG remains necessary for specific situations: favicons, email, social media, and logos with photographic elements. When you use PNG, optimize aggressively and export at 2x resolution for Retina displays.

JPG creates more problems than it solves for logos. The lack of transparency and compression artifacts damage your brand's presentation while offering no meaningful benefits.

Start with a clean vector source file. Export SVG as your primary website logo. Create optimized PNG versions for compatibility needs. Organize everything clearly for future updates. This approach ensures your logo looks professional and loads quickly regardless of where visitors see it.

Your logo represents your brand. The format you choose affects how millions of visitors experience that brand. Make the choice that prioritizes quality, performance, and flexibility. That choice is SVG.

Need properly formatted logo downloads in multiple formats? Having files ready in SVG, PNG, and other formats saves time and ensures consistency across all your marketing materials.

Read more

Subscribe to get fresh stories, tips, and logo resources delivered straight to your inbox.